segunda-feira, 9 de maio de 2011

An interview with Leodécio Martins Varela – English teacher



Mailson*: As far as we are concerned, we know that the supervised practice teaching is divided into three distinct stages: diagnostic phase, classroom teaching practice phase and the writing report one. Can you talk about these stages?
Leodécio: well, in the first stage, the trainee students visit the school in order to know the place of teaching practice, school infrastructure, available resource material and, the most important, the school staff: directors, supervisors, teachers and students as well as the administrative staff. That is, in this initial practice teaching phase, the student-teachers get to know the school in its totality, and mainly, the classroom – context of students and teachers teaching and learning.
Mailson: In this sense, what does the student-teacher need to do? or what does he/she investigate in this context of practice teaching?
Leodécio:  In this phase, the diagnostic one, as we have denominated it already, the student tries; in fact, to put into practice (knowledge) he/she has already “acquired” or reached in theoretical studies through the English Letras Course curriculum components: “Estrutura e Funcionamento do Ensino Básico, Didática, Metodologia do Ensino de Inglês, Prática de Ensino I/II”, among other subjects – English. It is important to highlight that in the field of Language Studies – the Applied Linguistic investigates the language use matters. Thus, in this stage, we are concerned with – in the context of class, the language use/usage by teachers and students concerning the discursive practices in the classroom. We also would like to tell you that our English and Portuguese classrooms were the mainly focus of investigation, by all means, of the student teachers. Nevertheless, as we work in an interdisciplinary perspective, we drew the student-teachers attention to the fact that they could also observe the classes of other subjects regarding the school infrastructure (classroom), teaching methodology, the classroom characteristics and language use/usage matters.
Mailson: But what has been observed in these classrooms by these student teachers?
Leodécio: As far as they are concerned, they could see that the classrooms are so small and there is no fresh air inside them. Teachers still make the use of blackboards and chalks, the chairs are really a mess and there is light matter inside the rooms as well as there is noisy matter coming from the outside part. Regarding the teaching methodology, the student-teachers detected that there is not a defined teaching methodology because each teacher seems, by all means, to carry out his/her own methodology teaching and also that teachers base their classes, mainly, on the didactic book distributed by MEC or DIRED, which it can imply, thus, problems in group work or interdisciplinary work.  If we have to describe the classrooms, according to the student-teachers´ observation, they are full of students, some are noisy, some are interested with a sense of participation, though, some classrooms are not so many participative, some students make the use of mobile phones and, according to student-teachers, teaching is teacher centered learning.
Mailson: Among so many problems, what is the language use/usage matter faced by teachers/students in the classroom?
Leodécio: we should say that student may have trouble with reading comprehension text; lack of knowledge on textual genres, trouble on writing as well as in oral conversation.
Mailson: What is the outcome of this investigation?
Leodécio: In an overall, students from school are interested according to student-teachers´ points of view. Nevertheless, they think that teaching methodology, applied by some teachers, does not motivate student for learning. Thus, in this school some teachers´ teaching practices seem to be teacher centered learning in some classrooms, making impossible students´ effective participation in their classrooms. In the face of it, student-teachers must, thus, make a course plan considering data collection analysis, reflection on/about the existing problems in the school and forecast an alternative action plan to achieve the outlined objectives in their planning.    
   
* trainee student from the 7th period of Letras (Inglês) - Assú/RN.



8 comentários:

  1. Hi people,

    I am happy that the program which I took my undergraduation is in constant progress. I really appreciate the engagement of all the participants involved in the improvement of the teaching and learning of English in our campi. Congratulation for you and your students for the commitment with teacher education.

    Cleiton
    P.S.:People here do not use the word trainee and its variation. They use education instead of train.

    ResponderExcluir
  2. ok cleiton, i used "trainee" - referring to teacher training "treinamento de professores" as it is in the book: "glossario de linguistica aplicada" by almeida filho and robert schmitz. but i really agree with the current term: teacher education. better educating people than training them, like we train an animal.
    thanks for your comment! this space, by all means, it is for teaching and learning experiences and the main tool to reach such processes it is the english language.

    ResponderExcluir
  3. I think very relevant this work.because I going make this too so help very much

    ResponderExcluir
  4. Teacher, your interview is very interesting as well as important for us. First of all, It is indispensable that the students from the 5th period of Letras read it, because at the next period we'll start the subject "Prática de Ensino I", with your guidance (thanks God!!!), and all this information are relevant.
    I didn't know the three stages of this subject: diagnostic phase, classroom teaching practice phase and the writing report one, however, I imagined how was important to know thoroughly the school staff, mainly the classroom and the students, before to start the teaching practice.
    Read about the problems observed by the students teachers was sad: the classrooms are small and they are full of students, teachers still are using blackboards and chalk and there is much noisy, but if there are real problems, we are also real and can try to change them.
    Thank you Leodécio for so many important information!!!

    ResponderExcluir
  5. you´re welcome, miss cunha!
    to start with, let me tell you something: at the diagnostic phase, you - as student teacher, can meet school staff, visit classrooms and meet students as well as you can also observe teachers´classes before your teaching practice starts. i agree with you when you say that the problems discussed by student teacher really made you sad. but you have to see something: teaching-learning process, somehow, is locally situated. so, the period you and your classmates are going to teach, teaching-learning problems, discussed by the student teachers, should not happen under the same circumstances . In this sense, school, students, teachers, discourse practice should be different. So, different will be the context of teaching-learning practice, you see. even if the school, teachers, students will be the same, the period your teaching practice takes place, you must see something: used language, performance, feeling, behavior and so on, by all means, will not be the same. people are constituted by language and so language is constituted by people. if one of it can change certainly the other aspects in one´s life will change as well. so, let´s wait and see what the future store for us, next semester, in terms of teaching practice before we can create any kind of expectation, ´cause this may lead us to label students as well as to create a sense of generalization. Anyway, thanks for words of encouragement and of real disposal.
    best regards,
    prof. leodécio

    ResponderExcluir
  6. You're welcome, teacher... And thanks for all!!!

    ResponderExcluir
  7. Hello Professor, after having read the interview, really realize how much has to be meticulous work of an educator. The situations are real and difficult. More are the future and we should make a difference.

    ResponderExcluir
  8. this interview is very good. I had many doubts about it.

    I'm a little nervous with the stage. But this experience will be important for us. we must develop our skills as teachers through practice!

    ResponderExcluir